Generated Source Mirror

This page is generated from the source Markdown file so it can be viewed inside the MkDocs site.

• Source path: bibliography/legal/SRC-KNESCHKE-OLG-HAMBURG-2025.md
• Source ID: SRC-KNESCHKE-OLG-HAMBURG-2025
• Edit this page | Suggest a change

🚧 Page Status: Early draft — needs sources and review

• Status: draft
• Sources: 0
• Relationships: 0
• Research debt items: 0

---

Kneschke v. LAION e.V., OLG Hamburg, 5 U 104/24

Bibliographic Metadata

• Author or issuing body: Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht (as reported in Medien Internet und Recht)
• Publication date: 2025-12-10
• Source type: Court decision report / press reprint
• URL: https://medien-internet-und-recht.de/volltext.php?mir_dok_id=3526
• Archive URL: None recorded
• Access date: 2026-09-02

Reliability Notes

Medien Internet und Recht reprint of an OLG Hamburg decision report for Urteil vom 10.12.2025, 5 U 104/24, affirming LG Hamburg 310 O 227/23. Primary for the appellate caption, dismissal of the appeal, and the reported holdings that both § 44b and § 60d UrhG applied, including that the opt-out was not effective as machine-readable. Not a substitute for the official judgment PDF. BGH review, if any, is outside this source.

Used For

• CASE-KNESCHKE-V-LAION
• TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT
• TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION

Document metadata

• Last verified: 2026-09-02
• Publication date: 2025-12-10
• Access date: 2026-09-02