Generated Source Mirror

This page is generated from the source Markdown file so it can be viewed inside the MkDocs site.

• Source path: bibliography/legal/SRC-KNESCHKE-LG-HAMBURG-2024.md
• Source ID: SRC-KNESCHKE-LG-HAMBURG-2024
• Edit this page | Suggest a change

🚧 Page Status: Early draft — needs sources and review

• Status: draft
• Sources: 0
• Relationships: 0
• Research debt items: 0

---

Kneschke v. LAION e.V., LG Hamburg, 310 O 227/23

Bibliographic Metadata

• Author or issuing body: Landgericht Hamburg, 10. Zivilkammer
• Publication date: 2024-09-27
• Source type: First-instance judgment (HTML reprint)
• URL: https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/c8o-27-09-2024-310-o-22723/
• Archive URL: None recorded
• Access date: 2026-09-02

Reliability Notes

Commercial reprint of LG Hamburg, Urteil vom 27.09.2024, Az. 310 O 227/23. Primary for the tenor (complaint dismissed) and the court’s holding that the reproduction was covered by the scientific-research TDM exception (the reprint discusses § 60d UrhG; § 44b was left undecided). Not an official court PDF. The WIPO informal English case summary is a secondary cross-check, not this record.

Used For

• CASE-KNESCHKE-V-LAION
• TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT
• TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION

Document metadata

• Last verified: 2026-09-02
• Publication date: 2024-09-27
• Access date: 2026-09-02