Generated Source Mirror

This page is generated from the source Markdown file so it can be viewed inside the MkDocs site.

• Source path: bibliography/legal/SRC-DISNEY-V-MIDJOURNEY-MTC-2026.md
• Source ID: SRC-DISNEY-V-MIDJOURNEY-MTC-2026
• Edit this page | Suggest a change

🚧 Page Status: Early draft — needs sources and review

• Status: draft
• Sources: 0
• Relationships: 0
• Research debt items: 0

---

Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Midjourney, Inc., Order on Motion to Compel

Bibliographic Metadata

• Author or issuing body: United States District Court for the Central District of California (Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin)
• Publication date: 2026-06-15
• Source type: District court discovery order (PDF)
• URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.973999/gov.uscourts.cacd.973999.88.0.pdf
• Archive URL: None recorded
• Access date: 2026-09-02

Reliability Notes

RECAP copy of the June 15, 2026 memorandum decision in No. 2:25-cv-05275-JAK-AJR. Primary for consolidation of the Warner Bros. action, the identity of the Warner Bros. Discovery plaintiffs, and the limited grant of Midjourney’s motion to compel. It is not a fair-use or infringement merits ruling. Midjourney later sought district-judge review of the order; that motion is not this source.

Used For

• CASE-DISNEY-V-MIDJOURNEY
• TOPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT
• TOPIC-AI-LITIGATION

Document metadata

• Last verified: 2026-09-02
• Publication date: 2026-06-15
• Access date: 2026-09-02